SFDR: A Guide to Current Rules and the Proposed Overhaul for Financial Institutions
The SFDR is entering a new era. The European Commission published a comprehensive overhaul proposal in October 2025, replacing the current Article 8/9 classification with a four-category product system, introducing a financial product sustainability indicator, and tightening entity-level principal adverse impact reporting. Meanwhile, the existing rules remain in force until the new regulation is adopted. This guide explains the current SFDR framework, the proposed changes, how they affect financial market participants, and what firms should do to prepare.
By Bo Yu, Founder & Managing Director | Updated March 2026 | ~20 min read
Executive Summary
The SFDR currently classifies financial products under Articles 6, 8, and 9 based on sustainability characteristics and objectives. A proposed SFDR 2.0 overhaul (June 2025 consultation) would replace this system with new product categories—Transition, ESG Basics, and Sustainable—each with minimum quantitative thresholds. Financial institutions should continue complying with current SFDR requirements while preparing for the structural changes expected to take effect from late 2028 or 2029.
What Is the SFDR
The Sustainable Finance Disclosure Regulation — Regulation (EU) 2019/2088 — is the EU's transparency framework requiring financial market participants (FMPs) and financial advisers (FAs) to disclose how they integrate sustainability risks, consider adverse sustainability impacts, and provide sustainability-related information about their financial products. It has been in application since March 2021, with the Regulatory Technical Standards (RTS) applying from 1 January 2023.
The SFDR applies to all EU FMPs and financial advisers, including asset managers (UCITS and AIFM), insurance companies offering investment products, pension providers, investment firms providing portfolio management, and credit institutions providing portfolio management. It also captures non-EU firms marketing products in the EU.
Since its introduction, the SFDR has effectively become the EU's de facto labelling system for sustainable financial products — despite never being designed as one. Almost 50% of EU assets under management are now in products classified as Article 8 or Article 9, representing over 60% of EU funds and up to 84% of global sustainable fund assets. This market reality — and the confusion it has created — is the primary driver of the SFDR 2.0 overhaul.
Current Requirements (SFDR 1.0)
The current SFDR imposes disclosure obligations at two levels: entity level (the firm) and product level (each financial product). The disclosures are organised around three pillars:
1. Principal Adverse Impacts (PAI) — entity level
Under Article 4, FMPs with 500 or more employees must disclose how they consider the principal adverse impacts of their investment decisions on sustainability factors. Firms below 500 employees may opt in or explain why they do not. PAI statements must be published on the firm's website and updated annually by 30 June. The RTS prescribe 18 mandatory PAI indicators (covering GHG emissions, biodiversity, water, waste, social and governance factors) plus a selection of additional opt-in indicators.
2. Sustainability risk integration — entity and product level
Under Article 3, firms must publish policies on the integration of sustainability risks into their investment decision-making process. Under Article 5, remuneration policies must be consistent with sustainability risk integration.
3. Product-level disclosures — Articles 6, 8, and 9
The SFDR's product classification system — which was never intended as a labelling regime but has functioned as one — distinguishes three categories:
| Article | Description | Disclosure requirements |
|---|---|---|
| Article 6 | Products that do not promote environmental or social characteristics and do not have sustainable investment as an objective | Must disclose how sustainability risks are integrated (or explain why they are not relevant). No additional SFDR-specific disclosures required. |
| Article 8 | Products that promote environmental or social characteristics (among other characteristics), provided the investee companies follow good governance practices | Pre-contractual, website, and periodic disclosures per the RTS. Must explain how the product meets its promoted characteristics. If the product makes sustainable investments, must apply the Article 2(17) definition including the "do no significant harm" (DNSH) test. |
| Article 9 | Products that have sustainable investment as their objective | Full pre-contractual, website, and periodic disclosures. Must explain how the sustainable investment objective is attained. All investments must qualify as "sustainable investments" under Article 2(17), subject to DNSH and good governance requirements. |
The SFDR 2.0 Proposal: A Complete Overhaul
On 20 November 2025, the Commission published its proposal to repeal and replace the existing SFDR. This is not an amendment — it is a new regulation. The proposal responds to widespread evidence that the current framework has become overly complex, that the Article 6/8/9 distinction functions as an unintended labelling system, and that disclosures are too long and technical for retail investors to use effectively.
The Three New Product Categories
The SFDR 2.0 proposal replaces Articles 6, 8, and 9 with three mandatory product categories. Each requires a minimum 70% investment commitment and category-specific mandatory exclusions. Products that do not qualify for any category fall into a residual "Other" classification (proposed Article 6a), which imposes strict conditions on ESG claims.
| Category | Proposed Article | Key requirements |
|---|---|---|
| Transition | Article 7 | At least 70% of assets invested in activities credibly transitioning toward sustainability. Must disclose Taxonomy alignment. Product-level PAI disclosure required. Mandatory exclusions apply. |
| ESG Basics | Article 8 | At least 70% of assets take ESG investment approaches into account, but do not meet the criteria for Transition or Sustainable. PAI disclosure at product level. Narrower exclusions. |
| Sustainable | Article 9 | At least 70% of assets invested according to a pre-defined sustainability strategy. Must disclose Taxonomy alignment. Product-level PAI disclosure required. Broadest exclusions. Must disclose a pre-set impact theory. |
What Is Being Removed
- "Sustainable investment" definition (Article 2(17)) — the concept that underpinned Article 8 (dark green type) and Article 9 classification, including the DNSH principle and good governance test, is removed entirely. Category integrity is instead based on minimum investment thresholds and mandatory exclusions.
- Entity-level PAI reporting (Article 4) — the requirement for firms to publish entity-level principal adverse impact statements is deleted, reducing administrative burden and addressing overlap with CSRD. Product-level PAI disclosures are retained for Transition (Art. 7) and Sustainable (Art. 9) products.
- Remuneration policy disclosure (Article 5) — the requirement to align remuneration with sustainability risk integration is removed.
- Portfolio management and financial advice — investment firms and credit institutions providing portfolio management, and financial advisers providing investment advice, are excluded from the scope of SFDR 2.0.
Interaction with CSRD, ESRS, and the Broader Sustainability Framework
The SFDR 2.0 proposal is explicitly designed to reduce overlap with the CSRD and align data requirements with the simplified ESRS. Specifically:
- The removal of entity-level PAI reporting responds to the overlap between SFDR entity-level disclosures and CSRD sustainability statements — the Commission's view is that corporate-level sustainability information should flow through the CSRD, not be duplicated at the fund manager level.
- Product-level SFDR disclosures under SFDR 2.0 are designed to reference fewer data points and to align with data available under the simplified ESRS, reducing the gap between what investee companies report and what fund managers need to disclose.
- EU Taxonomy alignment disclosures are retained but streamlined — only Transition (Art. 7) and Sustainable (Art. 9) products pursuing environmental objectives must disclose Taxonomy alignment.
- The broader Omnibus I simplification of CSRD (narrowing scope to 1,000+ employees / €450M+ turnover) has implications for SFDR data availability — with fewer companies reporting under the ESRS, financial institutions may face data gaps for investee companies that fall out of CSRD scope. The Commission is reviewing EU Taxonomy disclosure rules to address this.
Timeline: What Happens When
The current SFDR remains fully in force. Annual PAI reporting (by 30 June) and product-level disclosures continue as normal. The SFDR 2.0 proposal is at the beginning of the legislative process.
- March 2021 — SFDR entered into application
- 1 January 2023 — RTS (Delegated Regulation (EU) 2022/1288) applicable
- 20 November 2025 — Commission publishes SFDR 2.0 proposal
- 2026 — European Parliament and Council review and negotiate the proposal; trilogue expected
- Late 2026 – early 2027 (estimated) — Final text adopted
- 18 months after entry into force (estimated late 2028) — SFDR 2.0 applies; firms must comply
- From January 2028 (proposed) — Start-up phase; firms begin submitting certain information to the European single access point
- 2029 (estimated) — Certain product-level disclosures applicable
Prepare your product range for the SFDR transition
Tell us what you are working on. We will respond within 24 hours with a view on how we can help.
How to Prepare: A Framework for Financial Market Participants
Step 1: Continue full SFDR 1.0 compliance
The current SFDR remains in force. Do not reduce disclosure efforts in anticipation of SFDR 2.0. PAI reporting, pre-contractual disclosures, website disclosures, and periodic reporting for Article 8 and Article 9 products must continue on the existing schedule.
Step 2: Map your product range to the proposed categories
Assess how each existing Article 8 and Article 9 product would map to the proposed Transition (Art. 7), ESG Basics (Art. 8), or Sustainable (Art. 9) categories. Identify products that may not meet the 70% minimum investment threshold or the mandatory exclusion criteria. This mapping exercise will inform strategic decisions about product positioning, restructuring, or reclassification.
Step 3: Assess data availability under the simplified CSRD/ESRS
The Omnibus I narrowing of CSRD scope means fewer investee companies will be subject to mandatory sustainability reporting. Identify which portfolio companies fall out of the revised CSRD scope and assess the implications for your SFDR product-level disclosures. Consider alternative data sources (ISSB-aligned disclosures, voluntary VSME reporting, third-party ESG data providers) to fill potential gaps.
Step 4: Review exclusion policies
Each proposed SFDR 2.0 category has mandatory exclusions (weapons, tobacco, fossil fuels — with varying thresholds by category). Review your current exclusion policies against the proposed requirements and identify any products that would need portfolio adjustments.
Step 5: Monitor the legislative process
Track the European Parliament and Council positions on the SFDR 2.0 proposal. The final text may differ significantly from the Commission's proposal — the leaked November 2025 draft already differed from the published version on key points (including the professional-investor-only fund exemption). Position your compliance planning to be adaptable to the final text.
Frequently Asked Questions
Conclusion
The SFDR is at a turning point. The current regulation — with its unintended labelling system, complex PAI reporting, and interpretive ambiguity around "sustainable investments" — is being replaced by a purpose-built categorisation regime with mandatory thresholds, exclusions, and streamlined disclosures. For financial market participants, this is a structural change in how sustainable finance products can be designed, marketed, and governed.
The legislative process will take time, and the final text may differ from the Commission's proposal. But the direction of travel is clear: clearer categories, less overlap with CSRD, and higher bars for products making sustainability claims. Financial institutions that begin mapping their product ranges now, assessing data availability under the simplified CSRD, and building adaptable compliance infrastructure will be best positioned — whether the final rules arrive in late 2028 or early 2029.
Disclaimer: This article is intended as a practical orientation guide, not legal or investment advice. It reflects information available as of mid-March 2026. The SFDR 2.0 proposal (published 20 November 2025) is at the beginning of the EU legislative process — the European Parliament and Council have not yet established their positions, and the final text may differ materially from the Commission's proposal. Key uncertainties include: the final product category definitions, minimum thresholds, and exclusion criteria; the scope of entities subject to the new regulation; the application timeline; and the availability of transition relief. The current SFDR (Regulation (EU) 2019/2088) remains fully in force. Readers should verify all compliance-critical obligations against the authoritative legal text on EUR-Lex and seek qualified legal counsel before making compliance or product structuring decisions. Futureproof Solutions monitors regulatory developments continuously and updates this guidance accordingly.